tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12046714.post2275555938049281936..comments2024-03-27T13:58:49.915+01:00Comments on Words and what not: What benefit of translatewiki.net as a WMF project ,,GerardMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14287269079265427282noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12046714.post-37518362368300342722009-09-28T13:28:53.638+02:002009-09-28T13:28:53.638+02:00Translatewiki.net provides only for 1/259+ of func...Translatewiki.net provides only for 1/259+ of functionality that is important to the Dutch projects. If anything this makes it an ideal global project for the foundation itself.<br /><br />I do not know, do not think that translatewiki.net needs to make changes, it is already a great project in its own right.<br />Thanks,<br /> GerardMGerardMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14287269079265427282noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12046714.post-7081111153221494562009-09-28T10:33:57.005+02:002009-09-28T10:33:57.005+02:00Why not have it as a project of Wikimedia Nederlan...Why not have it as a project of Wikimedia Nederlands rather than the WMF? Not all Wikimedia projects need to be hosted by the WMF.<br /><br />One potential downside is that it could cause people to associate translatewiki.net entirely with the WMF, rather than something that services multiple projects run by different people. It would depend on how obvious the hosting provider was - whether it was just in the bottom corner, or whether it was incorporated into the logo.<br /><br />Having single user login to translatewiki.net could bring big advantages, though.Mike Peelhttp://www.mikepeel.net/noreply@blogger.com