The Wikimedia
Foundation is increasingly data driven and, consequently it is
vital to assess the quality of the data that policies and
developments are based on. The data is based on the results of
traffic to computers and mobile phones from Wikimedia servers. At the
same time the data of Wikipedia, maybe all the Wikipedias, is
available to organisations like Facebook. As Wikipedia articles
become better available in such a way, it does affect not only the
reach of Wikipedia but also the ratio between readers and editors.
Browsers are not the
only way to read data from Wikipedia; there are apps for tablets and
mobiles that make use of an API to retrieve articles from the WMF
servers. These numbers are not included in the statistics either. As
apps for tablets and phones are increasingly popular, it is not
unlikely that they are yet another factor that confuse a full
understanding of the status of the wiki.
When language support
is to be provided for all our users, it is important to know to what
extend all platforms are used. We know that mobile use is
growing rapidly and the numbers of tablets sold is also quite
staggering. What should be given priority for support and for language support.. What
numbers exist to support whatever choice properly.
Thanks,
GerardM
1 comment:
The answer to bad data isn't to bemoan a data-driven model. The answer is to *get better data*
Post a Comment