Wednesday, June 06, 2012

Publishing final versions

On #Wikipedia, an article never finds its final form. There is no final form, there is always a potential next iteration, never mind the quality of the current version. The same is true for Wiktionary; there is always room for another translation, another attribute.

When you want final forms, you produce something static. There are many reasons why this is done. One reason is to create a final version and create a collection of articles and calling it a book. Such books can be priced and it is quite legitimate to sell them on ebay. This has been done and when another such publication is found there are usually some people who complain about it.

For Wikisource and Wikibooks however there are finished products. In Wikisource a project can be considered finished once the proof reading of a digital text has been completed of what started as a scanned text. Only when it is finished, it is ready for easy public consumption.

What Wikisource does is provide the tools for this process. Essentially Wikisource serves a community that is engaged in a workflow. What it does not do so well is publish the finished products and find an audience for them.

The work at Wikisource is important. Its finished products are relevant and they are worthwhile. They fit in our aim to share in the sum of all knowledge. We can give things away, we can ask for a contribution but we owe it to our public that we make a best effort in making all this knowledge we are the custodian of easily accessible.

We may need a new project .. "Wikipublish" where we publish final versions of our "Wikisources". Where we publish collections of Wikipedia articles. Where we publish our "Wikibooks". We do not need much marketing, we need to make our finished goods available to a public and provide it in a format that it finds easy to digest.
Thanks,
       GerardM

16 comments:

jakob said...

As I just wrote in this blog article, its less about "final" but about delivering content in reusable forms. It should be easy to link to and get Wikipedia articles, Wikiquote quotations, Wikibook books, Wikisource publications etc. at every stage of development. Making content "final" should be no more than setting a flag, such as known from flagged revisions. So in my opinion there is no need for "Wikipublish" but for better content delivery in existing projects.

portable batch plant said...

At that time several Wikipedias were created that were not recognised as a language. In the mean time several of these have been recognised as a language and as a consequence have their own code.

portable batch plant said...

There is something about a part of us continuing into the future long after we are gone that appeals to us.

concrete batch plant said...

Only when it is finished, it is ready for easy public consumption.

portable batch plant said...

One reason is to create a final version and create a collection of articles and calling it a book.

concrete batch plant said...

This has been done and when another such publication is found there are usually some people who complain about it.

senior living communities california said...

Essentially Wikisource serves a community that is engaged in a workflow. What it does not do so well is publish the finished products and find an audience for them.

concrete batch plant said...

In the mean time several of these have been recognised as a language and as a consequence have their own code. 8

concrete batch plant said...

This has been done and when another such publication is found there are usually some people who complain about it.

concrete batch plant said...

There is something about a part of us continuing into the future long after we are gone that appeals to us.

Mobile Concrete Batching Plant said...

Essentially Wikisource serves a community that is engaged in a workflow. What it does not do so well is publish the finished products and find an audience for them.

portable batch plant said...

This has been done and when another such publication is found there are usually some people who complain about it.

bitumen sprayer said...

What it does not do so well is publish the finished products and find an audience for them.

concrete batch plant said...

Essentially Wikisource serves a community that is engaged in a workflow. What it does not do so well is publish the finished products and find an audience for them.

portable batch plant said...

In the mean time several of these have been recognized as a language and as a consequence have their own code.

Anonymous said...

Nice blog! Your content is interesting. As an SEO services company in Delhi, our group is dedicated to maintaining your company's website at the pinnacle of Google search results.