"en.wiki is the largest project and the breadwinner. It can go first"
"is it not a goal of the foundation to try to at least survive?"
I asked one question: "How important is growing traffic for our smallest projects". The answer that was given was more about the language versions of Wikipedia then about the smaller projects.. When you consider that Wiktionary is the biggest lexical resource on the Internet it is clear that an answer is of interest.
The answer I got was interesting: "I think our obligation is to focus our energy, for the most part, on the projects that have the greatest potential. And by "potential," I would mean the projects where there is a very large available readership (speakers of the language, internet-connected, literate). I guess I feel we have an obligation to focus our energy where it will make the most difference -- where there is enormous potential. That is easier said than done.."
My question was about growing traffic and it is interesting that the Russian Wikipedia traffic grew 117% in a year. There was a reaction in the chat that this was due to bot generated articles and while this may be true, the number of new editors is also much bigger for the Russians. The Russian localisation is also complete so as I see it, they are really doing well where it counts.
So when potential is the key consideration, the English Wikipedia grew 13% on a yearly basis in traffic and ranked nbr 155 in growth. The Swahili Wikipedia grew 150% and is ranked nbr 10. Obviously growth in percentage is not growth in absolute numbers this is best understood when you realise that all Wikipedias together grew 15%.
There is a potential for growth for the Wikipedias in other languages because they do not cover the most wanted articles yet. We do not even know what people want to read. Concentrating on what people want to read is in my view with improved localisation what will realise the growth of our other Wikipedias.