When you analyse the content of Commons, you will find that it is supplied by a community that largely follows the demographics of the traffic of the Wikimedia projects. A community that understands and communicates in English.
Wikimedia license texts |
This issue is well understood; Multichill harnesses the power of translatewiki.net to provide improved multi lingual support. The CSS of Commons provides the best right to left support of all the Wikimedia projects.
Layla and Majnun |
However, much of the original material is from western archives like the superb Library of Congress. Its content represents an American taste but at the same time it is the best we have and we cherish the LoC for this. What the LoC does not offer is contemporary material.
Given this line of thought, we need more media files from Afrika, Asia, South America and some parts of Europe. In order to get both contemporary and historic material we need to make it easier for people to contribute.
I welcome Guillaume's blog post that explains a need for improved tooling to manage Commons. Given that this will be implemented in software, we will engage our localisation community in order to make Commons easier for everyone even for those that do not speak English.
Thanks,
GerardM
1 comment:
Interesting post. As always, we need to improve the usability, mainly to get contain from places out of US.
In the Spanish Wikipedia, I have created a new "project", where articles without images are listed, in sections, sorted by proximity to a province.
You can see it at Wikipedia:Imágenes requeridas por zona. Now, people can see which articles near to them are missing images.
Regards
Post a Comment